Peer
network interactions might operate in a number of ways to develop and encourage
attitudes, values, and behaviours related to learning. Pattison (1994) argues
that social influence can be classified into three categories. Firstly, a
social relationship may determine the type of information a person is exposed
to. Secondly, typical patterns of social interaction may lead to social
influence, i.e., when students develop a shared level of mathematics anxiety to
show affinity to their peer group. And thirdly, social influence may occur when
people perceive that their social position (e.g. as an active or not-active
member of the peer network) has implications for cognition and behaviour.
Students with low performance (slow
learner) try to move the same phase as those with higher achievements in
mathematics, and if they failed to do so, they give up. Students with low
performance’s belief that they will not do better, they then influence friends
in their circle.
No comments:
Post a Comment